
Transforming Urban Markets for the Poor through Collective
Entrepreneurship
Bill
Drayton and Ashoka
Foreword: Excerpt from “Everyone a Changemaker: Social
Entrepreneurship’s Ultimate Goal”
As
part of its second generation of programs Ashoka started to
advance what we have gracefully named business/social “hybrid
value-added chains” (HVAC). This work originated in a major
“mosaic” collaboration involving across roughly 400 Ashoka
social entrepreneurs whose work is focused on ensuring full
economic citizenship to everyone. A good many of those working
toward this goal have found powerful leverage in reconnecting
business with the newly entrepreneurial/competitive citizen
sector through new value added chains involved in design,
production, distribution, servicing, and parallel supports
including finance. The new, more productive value added chains
draw for each step in the chain whatever each side can
contribute most effectively and efficiently. These hybrid
value-added chains represent an important source of new
investment opportunities for for-profit finance firms entering
the social financial services business.
Ashoka’s HVAC strategy is to get four very different
products/services quickly to the point where the customers,
businesses, and citizen groups are all benefiting enormously
from the new cooperative value-added chains. Once the businesses
in an industry see one of their competitors gaining important
new markets and making significantly higher profits, they cannot
afford not to follow. The same is true for the organizations
that compete with the pioneer HVAC citizen groups, once they see
how much their competitors are benefiting from large, stable,
nonpolitical, new revenues and their new, unique ability to
provide valued new services to their clients. This competitive
dynamic is key to the jujitsu that allows Ashoka, a small force,
to set in motion so large and irreversible an historical change.
In
order to achieve such transformation, what we must do now is
increase the proportion of humans who know that they can cause
change. And who, like smart white blood cells coursing through
society, will stop with pleasure whenever they see that
something is stuck or that an opportunity is ripe to be seized.
Multiplying society’s capacity to adapt and change intelligently
and constructively and building the necessary underlying
collaborative architecture, is the world’s most critical
opportunity now. Pattern-changing leading social entrepreneurs
are the most critical single factor in catalyzing and
engineering this transformation.[1]

____________________
Business, the most financially innovative and efficient sector
of all, has no direct mechanism
to
apply its practices to the goal of eliminating poverty.
Muhammad Yunus
What is at stake:
Liliana, a divorced mother of
five, lives in a favela in the suburbs of Sao Paolo.
She earns about $200 a month as an informal seamstress. She owns
a house with one bathroom, one kitchen and one family room that
she has spent about six years to build. She has invested about
$3,000 to date in her home, when she was able to put some money
aside or borrowing from friends. Since she bought a plot of land
from a municipality official when arriving to the Sao Paulo
region from her native village she believed to have a valid
title to her plot. But the development was illegal and that
piece of paper she holds dearly is not a formal title that she
can use as collateral. Her house has no sewage system and she
uses illegal water and electricity connections, which are free
if one forgets that supply is not always stable and
Liliana has to pay someone to
reconnect them from time to time.
Liliana
has a dream of adding a second floor and improving her house, to
provide a more dignified place for her children and maybe open a
small shop, but she has no bank account, no collateral typically
used by banks beyond a TV and a few other house appliances and
no pay slip at the end of the month. She qualifies, though, for
257% a year consumer loans, that she resorts to from time to
time. Community spirit is low so she will have to hire a
"half-spoon", an unqualified construction worker. Under the
current conditions Liliana will pay
$8,000 to incorporate about $4,000 doubtful quality improvements
to her home, brick by brick.
Ten eye-opening facts
on low-income housing markets
|
1.
World slum population |
1
billion |
2. New
slum residents per week |
500,000 |
3.
Percentage of urban population living in slums
|
>98% – Chad, Ethiopia
72% – Sub Saharan Africa
57% – South Asia
31% – Latin America
6% –
Developed countries |
4. Population density per hectare |
3,000
in Kibera slum (Kenya)
37 in
Washington DC |
5. Size
of low-income markets |
$332
billion – housing
$158
billion – health
$51
billion – ICT |
6. Total estimated dead capital in informal housing |
$9.3 trillion |
7. Dead capital per square mile in Dharavi slum, Mumbai |
$10 billion |
8.
Annual interest rate on unsecured lending in Brazil |
77% to
257% |
9.
Mortgage lending as a percentage of Gross Domestic
Product
|
2% – Brazil
7% – Colombia
54%– Germany
75% –
United States |
10.
Percentage of Millennium Challenge Corporation funds
dedicated to Housing and Shelter |
5% |
Liliana is not an isolated case.
The year 2007 marked a turning point in history, with one out of
every two people living in a city. One-sixth
of the world's population -- one billion people -- live in urban
slums in emerging countries. In addition, virtually all the net
growth of 2.6 billion in world population between now and 2050
is projected to occur in these cities. In effect, relatively
poor nations will build the equivalent of a city of more than
one million people each week for the next 45 years.
Many of the urban inhabitants in slums face tenuous employment
and precarious living situations. And the proportion of slum
dwellers under 25 is increasing, making slums a place where
disillusionment could be dangerous.
Breakdowns in the
low income housing value chain
Collectively, the poor have massively invested in their homes.
However, they do so in the most adverse conditions. They face
inefficient or non-existent property rights systems, often
compromised by corruption between developers and local
officials. They find construction materials that may be of
low-quality or unsuited to their needs, yet are priced more per
unit than a higher income client would have to pay. Low-income
people often build their own homes progressively, whenever they
have the money available. Many utilize informal advice and
labor from neighbors and friends, which often leads to unsafe
structures. Delivery channels in slums are limited by the
reluctance of formal companies to deal with small individual
transactions, not recognizing the aggregate demand in slum
communities. Finally, poor households have to pay cash or
borrow at high rates from moneylenders or consumer lending
institutions. In most developing countries, access to land and
adequate financing are critical ingredients to mend the
dysfunctional housing system, although other products and
services such as affordable quality construction materials are
also required.
Absent major
change, the bulk of urban development will occur informally,
outside formal markets at tremendous public and private cost.

All indications are that low-income urban households are the
markets of the future. Low income housing markets were recently
estimated at about $330 billion[2].
Despite this, housing has not received as much attention; for
example, only 5% of the Millennium Challenge Corporation’s
funding is directed to housing.[3]
Yet housing is a human right in itself. It is a springboard for
human and economic development that can impact the health,
security, income flow, and self-esteem of poor families who are
also
more vulnerable to climate change risks, as precarious housing
is threatened by flooding, sea-level rise, and extreme weather
patterns.[4]
The core question that we would like to explore with readers in
this special issue of the Global Urban Development Magazine
is precisely how to address the housing market failures that
low-income families are facing around the world. How to
develop, operate and scale transformative business models that
are adapted to the reality of low-income communities around the
world: small-sized transactions, informal economy and lack of
traditional distribution channels. How to think creatively
beyond individual construction-related products or low-cost
technologies to develop
sustainable
urban markets.
A changing landscape of
innovations and opportunities
The pressures on slum communities have prompted national and
international networks that share experience and strengths, such
as Slum Dwellers International and the Asian Coalition for
Housing Rights (ACHR). ACHR has worked with over 50,000
households in Thailand to upgrade, re-block, or relocate
communities, fostering creativity, hope, and unleashing
commercial growth potential in urban spaces. Experimentations
in low-income housing are emerging around the world, from
sanitation improvements to community mobilizing that touches
hundreds of families at a time.
Similarly, new financing schemes for home improvement and new
homes have rapidly developed over the last few years with the
expansion of housing microfinance.
Several
models have been demonstrated successfully
but they are still benefiting only a fraction of the population
given that traditional microfinance is serving about 10 percent
of the market and
housing
microfinance is a subset of microfinance[5].
With regards to products, innovation in low-cost
housing technologies continues even though it is often not
available to low-income consumers due to lack of financing or
delivery systems: a vicious circle.
Overall, new solutions and models are serving only a fraction
of the population; they are fragmented and often limited to one
sector – be it the public, private, or citizen sector.
Government housing programs have evolved based on experience but
tend to be slow-moving and fickle. Many of them still ignore
market forces, informal processes, and low-income communities’
norms such as progressive housing and the desire to choose one’s
neighbors. In the other sectors, citizen sector initiatives are
easily fragmented, and only a few “enlightened” companies have
stepped into low-income housing with the energy and commitment
required.
How do we broaden access to financing and complementary services
across multiple distribution channels in low-income communities
–
such as retailers, banks, or community-based organizations, in
addition to microfinance organizations? How do we bring all of
these solutions together in cost-effective “last mile”
solutions?
The current
“silent” revolution of the citizen sector could offer new
opportunities for low-income housing and urban development.[6]
Although the business sector has had an edge in being
entrepreneurial and competitive following the industrial
revolution, since the 1980s the citizen sector has been rapidly
catching up. The citizen sector has been growing explosively,
generating jobs two and a half to three times as fast as
business.[7]
The citizen sector is also becoming more professional, guided
by leading social entrepreneurs and local changemakers. There
are now millions of modern, competing citizen groups, including
large, sophisticated second-generation organizations, in Brazil,
North America, Europe, and Southeast Asia.
No sector alone
can meet the challenge of low-income housing. In order to
provide housing with dignity for one billion slum dwellers, the
business, citizen, and government sectors need to work
together. For example, citizen sector organizations may have
knowledge of what low-income people need, how they make
investment decisions, and whom they trust. They speak to
low-income people daily in places where companies fear to tread.
Leading citizen sector organizations know how to change
behaviors and mindsets and foster collective action, be they
introducing women’s savings groups, sanitation, or
anti-corruption campaigns. Leading businesses bring expertise
in product design and marketing, acquiring and allocating
capital, managing large-scale operations, information systems,
and performance management. Federal and local governments need
to lead efforts towards effective land tenure, infrastructure,
and business-friendly environments.
Ashoka’s vision
is a world in which CSOs and businesses collaborate, compete and
learn to serve low-income markets with new business models,
enabled by governments. A world in which every person
participates as a full economic citizen, improving their lives
by having access to affordable products and services, being able
to work and get paid, and leveraging their assets.
Structure of this Issue
As an increasing number of financially self-sustaining models
are developed to serve low-income markets, new opportunities
emerge for players involved in housing, basic services, urban
development, and finance. There is a need for new business
models combining profits and social impact, new roles, new
investment mechanisms, new policy frameworks, and new mindsets –
all these driven by innovation and competition. The aim of this
issue of Global Urban Development Magazine is therefore
to inspire new players to explore the social and financial
potential of low income housing and urban development, to equip
existing players with practical “how to’s” and to trigger a
dialogue about collective entrepreneurship. Our goal is to
foster a learning community of business, social, and public
entrepreneurs to learn from previous experiences, keep refining
our understanding of obstacles and success factors to drive
transformative solutions at a big scale and innovate together.
This issue will provide perspectives on both micro and macro
dimensions related to the low-income housing and urban
development issues. It will discuss examples to develop,
operate, and scale transformative market-based models that are
adapted to the reality of low-income communities around the
world and that goes beyond specific products or low-cost
technologies to offer comprehensive solutions.
We included a select number of cases and articles of pioneers in
the field presenting insights on issues such as: What do
low-income households need? How do they make decisions? How can
businesses get started with low-income market initiatives? What
steps have successful ventures taken to address the strategic,
managerial, and cultural challenges of serving the poor? What
are the competitive advantages of businesses and CSOs in the
different steps of a value chain?
This special issue is divided into six thematic parts
structured to reflect various enabling factors for low-income
housing markets and urban development:
Core topics |
Articles |
Descriptions |
Introduction |
·
Creating a World Without Poverty: Social Business and
the Future of Capitalism |
·
Prof.
Muhammad Yunus’ call for a new form of enterprise, a
social business that serves poor people while turning a
profit |
How
to assess the size of low income housing markets |
·
The Next 4 Billion – The Housing Market
|
·
Quantifies and explains the potential market for
low-income housing around the world based on household
expenditure patterns |
·
A
Value Chain Framework for Affordable Housing in Emerging
Countries |
·
Introduces the scale of the problem in urban slums, and
discusses the market potential that arises from
understanding low-income housing needs, such as
progressive informal building |
How
to mobilize and empower communities to transform urban
markets |
·
WWB
Gender Study: The Capacity of Poor Women to Grow Their
Businesses in the Dominican Republic |
·
Examines how low-income women in the Dominican Republic
manage their finances, including savings, housing, and
starting and growing businesses |
·
Social Market Development and Social Mobilization in the
Value Chain of the Construction Industry |
·
Discusses the advantage of working with social movements
in Brazil to gain understanding of what low income
people want in housing
|
·
Understanding Asian Cities: A Synthesis of the Findings
from Eight City Case Studies
|
·
Discusses in-depth insights about recent developments in
Asian cities, including contradictions within cities,
roles of different actors, and the transformative impact
of the citizen sector |
How
to unlock these markets addressing the issue of land
tenure |
·
Market-Based Models for Land Development for the
Low/Moderate-Income Majority |
·
Analyzes the gaps in the value chain that hinder low
income housing, describes progressive housing as a
technique, and analyzes relative strengths and
weaknesses of two approaches to providing low income
housing, in Pakistan and El-Salvador |
·
Putting the “Housing” Back into Housing Finance for the
Poor: The Case of Guatemala |
·
Describes the current state of housing microfinance in
Guatemala, the model G and T Continental designed to
provide multiple services along with housing credit, and
the efforts of the company to create alliances to solve
gaps in the housing value chain |
How
to mobilize financing for these markets
|
·
Housing Microfinance: Is the Glass Half Empty or Half
Full?
|
·
Discusses the current state of housing microfinance, and
describes specific development from Peru, Mexico, and
Brazil. In light of persistent unmet demand, provides
recommendations to provide housing micro-finance at
scale |
·
Capital-Market Funding of Affordable Housing Finance in
Emerging Countries: The Business Case
|
·
Analyzes the current bottlenecks regarding funding of
housing finance, including the lack of viable
institutional partners capable of serving this market,
and long-term funding in local currency. Highlights the
causes of these bottlenecks and the impetus to address
them. |
·
Finance for Low-Income Housing and Community Development
|
·
Analyzes current sources of financing for low income
housing, state and international financing options, and
the need for further financial services for housing |
How
to innovate business models
|
·
Housing the Poor by Engaging the Private and Citizen
Sectors: Social Innovations and “Hybrid Value Chains” |
·
Explains the unique advantages of involving both the
private and citizen sectors in commercial collaborations
for low income housing and provides examples of
innovative business model |
·
Bringing Low-Income Consumers into the Market in
Colombia: Home Improvements that Make a Difference |
·
Describes Colceramica’s business model supporting
progressive housing for low income people in Colombia,
including history, challenges, changes that were
required, and prospects for growth |
How
to create an enabling environment for private
initiatives in urban development |
·
Private Sector Involvement in Slum Upgrading
|
·
Discusses the barriers to private sector involvement in
low-income housing, including land tenure and the need
for public investment, as well as the opportunities for
private sector contributions to low income housing |
·
The Millennium Cities Initiative: A Comprehensive Approach to Reducing
Urban Poverty and Generating Sustainable
Prosperity
|
·
Describes the efforts of the Millennium Cities
Initiative to reach the Millennium Development Goals in
concert, recognizing that efforts to achieve one goal
(health, education, housing, etc.), may fail due to lack
of another of the MDGs |
Bill Drayton
is CEO and Founder of Ashoka.
He is also chair of Youth Venture, Community Greens, and Get
America Working! Formerly he served as Assistant Administrator
at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
He was selected as a MacArthur Fellow in 1984, and in 2005,
he was designated as one of “America's Best Leaders” by US
News & World Report and the Harvard University Center for
Public Leadership.
About Ashoka
Ashoka is a global network of leading social
entrepreneurs. Since its creation 27 years ago, it has
invested in over 2,000 social entrepreneurs in 62 countries
through a “social venture capital” approach as a way to
address major social challenges with systemic responses.
Ashoka Fellows are selected for their innovative and
practical solutions to social needs.
Ashoka’s work on Hybrid Value Chains
originates from the work of a significant group of Fellows
around the world whose work is focused on ensuring full
economic citizenship to everyone. Several of these social
entrepreneurs working toward this goal have found powerful
leverage in connecting business with the increasingly
competitive citizen sector through new value chains for
products/ services design, production, distribution,
servicing and cross-cutting support like financing. The new
business-social value chains draw whatever each side can
contribute most effectively for each step in the chain.
Ashoka’s strategy is to demonstrate the Hybrid Value
Chain (HVC) model in several industries to the point where
the customers, businesses and citizen groups all
significantly benefit from the new value chains. Beyond
specific business-social partnerships, our goal is to
transform sectors and reach an irreversible change in the
relationships of the business and citizen sectors. To do so,
we are demonstrating the HVC concept through a series of
business-social ventures in low-income housing, healthcare
and small producers’ economies. With the support of the
Hilti Foundation and in collaboration with its community of
social entrepreneurs, Ashoka launched a multi-country
Housing for All program in 2007, starting with Brazil and
India.
For more information, visit us at:
www.ashoka.org or contact us at
fec@ashoka.org
[1]
As Ashoka has come to understand this more clearly, it has
clarified its ultimate goal. Challenged several years
ago by eBay’s Pierre Omidyar, Ashoka came to understand,
given its understanding of these historical forces it
came into being to serve, that its ultimate goal is an
“everyone a changemaker” world. Before that, it had
talked chiefly in terms of the intermediate goal of
building an entrepreneurial/competitive citizen sector.
[2]
The Next 4 Billion: Market Size and Business Strategy
at the Base of the Pyramid. Washington, DC: World
Resources Institute and International Finance
Corporation, 2007
[3]
Joseph F. Lombardo, Jr. and Kerstin Tebbe: Estimate
of the Millennium Challenge Corporation’s Urban and
Shelter-Based Investments: International Housing
Coalition, April 2008
[4]
Gordon McGranahan: Urban environments, wealth and
health: shifting burdens and possible responses in low
and middle-income nations. IIED Human Settlements
Program, 2007
[5]
See Bruce Ferguson’s article in this journal; “Housing
Microfinance: Is the Glass Half Empty or Half Full?”
for a full discussion of housing microfinance
[6]
Defined as an organization primarily seeking social
value. Ashoka has adopted the
terms "Citizen Sector" and "Citizen Sector Organization”
instead of negative definitions such as “Non-Profit” and
“Non Governmental Organizations”. The scope of these
organizations may range from economic development to
health, education, environment, etc.